Courtroom coverage…the juggling act
June 25, 2008 by Stephen ThirkillONE of the hardest aspects of covering major court cases is the balancing act between staying in the courtroom and getting back to the office.
With so much potential news stories and background material being unearthed on a daily basis it is often both easy and tempting to stay for long periods in court, at the cost of the day-to-day stories needed to fill the rest of the paper.
Personally I find myself worrying that if I don’t stay in court as much as possible I will miss some crucial element of the proceedings.
But the truth of the matter is it is pretty much impossible to be in court all the time, it is pretty much impossible to report on everything that happens and it is pretty much impossible to sit and concentrate on every detail every day for nine weeks.
And despite spending nearly every day in court for the last three weeks I still managed to miss a major report on a witness claiming he was paid to guard £30m worth of drugs, so I guess the morale of the story is, you can’t do it all.
But it was indeed rather frustrating to see that particular report on the front of the Nottingham Evening Post and realise I had missed out on a gem of a story, despite all my recent efforts.
Really, all that you can do as a reporter is manage your time effectively, covering the early parts of the trial when the main details and all the juicy facts are uncovered and then dip in and out of the hearing as and when an important event or witness enters the court arena.
It is a difficult juggling act, but a skill that becomes much easier as the trial slowly grinds on and on.